Search within the Lindenbaum website

home / news & insights /

Amsterdam, 1 February 2023

Lindenbaum opens its Amsterdam office

By Damiën Berkhout & Stefan Tuinenga

The law firm Lindenbaum opens its offices in Amsterdam. The firm specializes in complex commercial and corporate litigation, with a focus on class actions and antitrust litigation on the plaintiff side. The firm’s attorneys have been involved in some of the largest settlements and disputes in Europe.

The founding partners of Lindenbaum, Damiën Berkhout and Stefan Tuinenga were previously partners at the litigation firm Scott+Scott, where they helped start the Dutch office in 2019.  

Berkhout is the managing partner of the firm. He specializes in complex corporate, commercial and class action claims. Berkhout has a track record as both a defence- and plaintiff-side litigator. He recently acted as lead counsel for eight multinationals in the trucks cartel case, and for the Take Back Your Privacy Foundation in its WAMCA class action against TikTok. He also represented the supervisory board of AkzoNobel during its successful takeover battle defence against PPG, and was involved in the largest European class settlement to date, the Fortis/Ageas WCAM. Previously, he worked as a litigator at the law firms Stibbe and Paul Weiss, and served as the managing partner of the Dutch office of Scott+Scott.

Berkhout said: “We will provide our clients with the ability to engage experts who have worked as plaintiff and defence lawyers. Because we have experience on both sides, we know what strategies work. Lindenbaum will focus on representing victims of unlawful behaviour, and those victims can be multinationals or consumers. Our mission is to combat cartels, breaches of ESG regulations and mismanagement.

Tuinenga specializes in international antitrust litigation and collective actions. Tuinenga worked on many high profile European antitrust cases and has experience litigating on both the plaintiff and defence side, including the power cables, trucks, air cargo, and gas insulated switchgear cartel cases.  He also represented the Consumer Competition Claims Foundation in a collective action claim on behalf of European consumers against Apple. Tuinenga led the antitrust litigation department of Scott+Scott in the Netherlands. Previously, he helped establish and was the director of the Fair Trade Authority of Curaçao, and he worked as an antitrust attorney at the law firm Stibbe.

Tuinenga said: “Our mission is to ensure that companies, investors and consumers can effectively enforce their rights. We are excited to open the doors of our litigation-only law firm.

Press coverage

Please find press coverage about the opening of Lindenbaum here:

Mr.: “Advocatenkantoor Lindenbaum vestigt zich in Amsterdam”

Advocatie.nl: “Partners van Scott+Scott openen nieuw litigation kantoor in Amsterdam

Global Data Review: “Scott+Scott partners leave to form new litigation firm

Damiën Berkhout

Partner, dispute resolution expert

Contact

Stefan Tuinenga

Partner, antitrust litigation expert

Contact

More publications

Amsterdam Court rules on how to calculate damages in air cargo cartel cases

28 November 2024 - News

On 6 November 2024, the Amsterdam District Court ruled on the methodology to be used for the damage calculation in follow-on claims of indirect purchasers from the air cargo cartel.

Read more

Landmark climate change judgment: the Hague Court of Appeal confirms Shell’s obligation to limit its CO2 emissions, but rejects NGOs’ claims

13 November 2024 - Insights

Milieudefensie et al. claimed that Shell has a societal duty of care to reduce its emissions by 2030 with 45% compared to 2019. In first instance the District Court of The Hague ruled in favor of Milieudefensie et al. The Court of Appeal overturned the District Court’s decision and rejected the claims.

Read more

Right to assign antitrust damages claims follows directly from EU law, AG opines

5 November 2024 - Insights

AG Szpunar confirms in an opinion for the ECJ that the right for injured parties of a competition law infringement to assign their claims to a litigation vehicle for the purpose of starting damages proceedings follows directly from the cartel prohibition of Article 101 TFEU. Moreover, national rules that make the assignment of antitrust damages claims impossible or excessively difficult should be disapplied.

Read more